🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations produced results, and revealed recent overtures had come from mediators to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states used their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if negotiations restart.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and continues the primary resolution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the same tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the nation in the face of this attack."